Grant Halford Grant Halford

2006

The Tipping Point for a House of Cards

The Tipping Point for a House of Cards

Everyone has built a house of cards at some time.  Many of us may have even watched the Netflix series.  Regardless, we all know that any house of cards is always one moment away from reaching its tipping point.

The Jay Martin Show recently published a YouTube video 2008 vs 2026: The Same Dominoes are Falling, identifying a financial house of cards and its tipping point.  Martins’ 25-minute video utilizes graphics to describe the details of the current stock market AI bubble in which $2 trillion locked in future income from AI companies (like Open AI & and Anthropic) are due to the Big 10 tech giant companies (like Microsoft, Oracle, Google, Amazon) that make up 40% of the S&P 500 Index Fund.

 

Explaining the AI Bubble

Entrepreneurial AI companies, whose expenses are substantially higher than their revenues, need to continue to raise new money to pay those higher expenses.  To raise more new money in the stock market, these companies’ valuations must continue to increase.

These AI companies’ valuations are growing as they ‘sell’ future revenues to the Big 10 companies.  Effectively, these sales are IOUs.  Once new IOUs are sold, the AI companies valuation rises, and they can in turn raise ever-greater investments from the market to pay for ever larger expenses.  Concurrently, the Big 10 tech giants account for IOU’s (or future payments) they’ve bought as assets, in the form of backlog of guaranteed future income.  The same $2 trillion mentioned earlier.  These Big 10 tech giants are then using their IOU assets as collateral to finance the debt utilized to build their growing operations, primarily new data centers.  This sounds like a house of cards to me.

 

Is there a Historical Rhyme for this scenario?

No one remembers 2006, when headlines were still saying everything was fine.  But everyone remembers the crash of 2008.

In 2006, many US mortgages were structured based on house prices going up forever.  Rules allowed mortgage refinancing every two years and you could use the higher house value to pay off the old smaller mortgage and start again with a new larger mortgage.  The mortgage was never paid off, only replaced.  In hindsight, this too looks like a house of cards.

House prices continued to climb in 2006, to new all-time highs.  The subtle, unnoticed change was prices climbing more slowly, an 8% increase rather than 15%.  All was good, no worries, right?  But the smaller increase was not enough to pay off the old mortgage and restart with a new mortgage.   The resulting house price crash came in 2007, and the market panic came in 2008.  Note the mortgage loans did not fail when the housing prices fell.  The tipping point was earlier, in 2006 when all still looked good.

If the 2006 historical rhyme can be applied to the 2026 AI Bubble, it would be due to AI company IOU sales slowing and in turn their valuation increases also slowing.  While the US remains the world leader in entrepreneurial development of AI technology, this shouldn’t be any concern.

 

AI Tipping Point?

China has spent the last 30 years replacing the US as the world’s leading developer and producer of so many products and services.  This included textiles, steel and ships, lately solar panels and EVs with BYD now superseding Tesla.

Most recently, in July 2026 a Chinese AI lab called Moonshot released a coding model, within weeks beating the best models from Open AI and Anthropic.  As their Kimi K3 model increases user base, the ability of US AI companies to sell their IOUs and raise valuations may continue to grow to new all-time highs, but more slowly.  Is this the tipping point of the AI Bubble?

 

How could this affect us?

The belief in American AI holds up the S&P 500.  The S&P 500 holds up the world’s savings in American stock markets. And Canada has 47% of its investment in the US, largely in the stock market.

No one can predict the timing of a tipping point.  However, you can know if your investments are a house of cards.  What percent of your investments are impacted by the AI house of cards?  Be Prepared.

Read More
Grant Halford Grant Halford

Two Years Later

Is History Rhyming?

Is History Rhyming?

The inaugural Be Prepared blog in July 2024 set out a thesis that a storm was coming for our personal finances.  That certainly hasn’t happened yet, when considering the stock market has delivered our readers 20% returns in each of the past two years.  It would be easy to assume, based on the market’s last two years, that authors Dalio, Howe and Alden who anchored that inaugural History Rhymes blog must have got it all wrong.

Maybe we should review the timelines and see if the rhyme should have peaked or be complete by now:

·         Dalio – has the most short-term perspective of our reference authors.  He currently believes the (governments) debt cycle may find its bottom within only a couple years

·         Howe – his social demographic view of the US has been substantially advanced by the re-election of Donald Trump (since the start of this blog).  Yet he still believes the Fourth Turning is most likely to reach its conclusion in the early 2030’s, some five years away

·         Alden – ongoing work continues to reference her belief that Nothing Stops this Train (of growing debt) anytime soon, and that the debt growth could realistically continue for a decade or more

‍ ‍

The timelines all suggest that two years is not enough time to properly judge if a storm will or will not come for our personal finances, in the form of rhyming history.

‍ ‍

What do the key indicators tell us about the likelihood of a financial storm:

·         Debt – is certainly growing, both privately and at the government level.  We’re all aware of how large new mortgages are compared to when we older folks bought our homes.  And at the government level, debts are growing rapidly across most of the developed world, as we re-arm without any meaningful cuts.

·         Inflation – remains stubborn, as it’s stuck above 2% in Canada and is hovering around 4% in the US.  We also all know that groceries are much higher than 2% price growth year over year.  Not to mention, we haven’t had any relief (deflation or lower prices) from the 6% to 8% inflation experienced in 2022.  Cost of living has only continued to rise since then.

·         Bonds – which constitute a third to half of most readers’ portfolios, have been stuck in neutral since the fall of 2022.  While your stocks have delivered great returns, your bond funds have delivered an average return of zero for four years.  Combined results make the last couple years look good, but not great.

·         Stocks – continue to post all-time highs but are themselves a point of concern as covered in my Mean Reversion blog earlier this year.  They are signaling it’s time for a correction to the downward side.

I continue to believe these and other authors and experts who see the writing on the wall for a storm to come to our personal finances.  As a result, we have a large percent of our investments in a diverse range of real assets and asset producers.  We also currently have a significant amount of cash built up from selling profitable market positions over the last year.  This cash sits in funds delivering small inflation-like returns until lower purchase prices present themselves for real assets, asset producers, and blue-chip dividend paying stocks.

‍ ‍

Don’t be blinded by the headline-producing wins in the general market.  Consider the probability (or at least possibility) of a storm coming.  Be Prepared.

‍ ‍

Read More
Grant Halford Grant Halford

Energy is Life

Don’t take it for granted. Use it to backstop your investments.

‍ ‍Don’t take it for granted.  Use it to backstop your investments.

Historically water, food, and shelter are the foundations of life.  But that has changed over the last 150 or so years.

Sourcing, processing and delivering water to your home requires energy.  Farming, processing and transporting food to the store requires energy.  Getting it home requires more.  Heating, cooling, lighting, cooking, and food storage in your home requires energy.  So, unless you can or do live ‘off the grid’ energy is now life.

‍ ‍

We may not like the fact that ‘dirty’ hydrocarbon energy sources - coal, oil and natural gas - remain over 81% of global consumption while nuclear and renewables increase over time.  But we must acknowledge that we can’t live without these fossil fuels for the coming decades through this transition.  With 10-20% of the world’s supply of oil and liquified natural gas impacted by the Iran war, just weeks from the wars’ outset, countries are beginning to encourage less energy consumption and planning for energy shortages should the war continue much longer.

‍ ‍

We personally may be ok in Canada, bearing only higher fuel, food and flight prices, but with the Hormuz interruptions, portions of the world are close to abrupt shortage of life-giving energy.  Do you think the citizens of Europe or Asia care about the source of energy when faced with a lack of energy? No.  Blunt reality will reinforce energy is life.

‍ ‍

So, what’s the point?

If energy is so fundamental to our existence, then it should also be a good investment.

‍ ‍

In the previous blogs Fiat, Reset, Nothing Stops this Train and Debasement we reviewed various elements about how our fiat currencies are being devalued and will be reset in time.  The direct impact of this process is the devaluation of bonds, which happen to be 40% of the typical person’s savings.  For some decades bonds and the bond market were the safe haven relative to the more volatile stock market equities in a balanced portfolio.

‍ ‍

I believe our energy transition away from hydrocarbons to nuclear and renewables will last more decades than the currency reset and related bond devaluation.   For this reason, I believe energy, like other commodities, is a relatively better investment safe haven than bonds and bond markets.  Since we practice what we preach, our investments include over 10% energy companies, including uranium, oil & natural gas producers.  Be Prepared.

‍ ‍

Read More
Grant Halford Grant Halford

Great Power

America’s Empire is Declining.  Where does that leave Canada?

‍ ‍America’s Empire is Declining.  Where does that leave Canada?

A social media post by Katusa Research includes this chart and a quote by historian and author Niall Ferguson saying "No great power has survived once debt servicing costs exceeded defense spending. Britain. Habsburg Spain. Now America."

The chart looks back fifteen years comparing the United States interest payments (red) against defense spending (blue).  While defense dipped then returned to growth, interest has been climbing rapidly in the last few years, because of higher deficits combined with increased interest rates applied to the existing and new debts.

The chart and Ferguson’s quote echo the findings of Ray Dalio in his Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order research and book.  As discussed in History Rhymes (1), Dalio’s 500 years of research finds that a cycle of bad finances is one of the three primary reasons for change of great powers.

In their book Why Empires Fall, Peter Heather and John Rapley (2) make numerous references to excessive levels of government debt, often from war, as a relevant factor in the decline of an empire.  They also point out as a great powers decline, the need for defense spending tends to increase as new rivals challenge the declining superpower.  A vicious circle.

Ferguson, Dalio, Heather & Rapley provide us with three references to debt and interest as indicators of a great power (or empire) in decline.  Will this crossover continue or reverse?  It is common knowledge that the US government continues to run large deficits each year, growing their debt ever faster.  Concurrently, interest rates remain elevated a few percent above the near zero lows of the 2010’s.  Higher interest rates applied to servicing larger debts results in higher interest payments.

Could defense spending outpace the growth of interest payments and reverse the crossover?  It could, however the vicious circle of increased defense spending is done with the use of deficits and debt to pay for it.  I’d suggest the probability of the crossover permanently reversing is relatively small.

Decline does not necessarily mean the end of the US, rather a transition from a great power to a smaller, lesser power.  Think of the British Empire, whose great power military and financial dominance waned after WW1 and dropped rapidly after WW2.  Nonetheless, they remain, generations later, as a significant middle power on the global stage.

What does this mean for Canada?

Canada is a geographical neighbor to the world’s current great power.  Prior to that we were a colony of the since-declined British Empire.  What a favored, perhaps even spoiled, existence we’ve lived for some 200 plus years. We have benefited from the military and economic might of these great powers.  This appears to be changing.

It is reasonable to assume that as the US declines, we will need to become more responsible to defend ourselves, grow our own economy and diversify our trade.  There are early positive steps in these directions being taken by our government, their timeline measured in months.  We as citizens and voters need to understand that for Canada to Be Prepared we need do our part to keep our country on the right path towards greater self-sufficiency through the coming decades.

‍ ‍

1.      History Rhymes, Be Prepared blog 8 July 2024, https://www.bepreparedcanada.net/

2.      Why Empires Fall: Rome, America, and the Future of the West, Heather & Rapley, 2023

‍ ‍

Read More
Grant Halford Grant Halford

Mean Reversion

What is it and why does it matter?

What is it and why does it matter?

Regression to the mean is a statistical law where an unusually high or low measurement is likely to be followed by a measurement closer to the average (or geometric mean).  Anyone remember this from Stats class?

Financial (stock) markets call this mean reversion.  The financial markets apply this stats law as a trading theory that asset (stock) prices eventually revert to their long-term mean or average level.  Basically, what goes up must come back down.

Standard Deviation

Within a statistical regression model, standard deviation (SD) measures the typical distance between observed data points and the (predicted) regression line, indicating model accuracy.

Stock Market Valuation

Moving from stats into stock markets, there are many recognized ways to place value on an individual company in the market.  And by extension, the entire stock market can also be valued.

Methods of valuation include a comparison of company stock price to its earnings (P/E ratio), a cyclically adjusted company stock price to earnings (Cyclical P/E or CAPE ratio), company value to replacement cost of assets (Q ratio), and a simple look at a company’s stock price.

Keep in mind that company (and market) valuations are estimated true worth of a company (the entire market) while price is simply what an investor pays for a share at any given moment.

The Graph

The busy graph provided as this blog’s image, complements of Venable Park (1), includes an average of four different stock market valuations covering a large data set, a period of 125 years.  The X axis is in %, with the geometric mean identified as 0%.  The horizontal lines represent standard deviations (SD) above and below the geometric mean.  The vertical grey areas represent historical periods of recession.  The pink areas represent the most recent valuation decline and speculation on the next decline.  The blue arrows and comments are added by Venable Park.

What Does the Graph Tell Us?

About the Stock Market

·         Four different valuation methods agree stock valuations are at all-time highs

·         Mean reversion of stock valuations is increasingly likely

About the Last 50ish Years (2)

·         Recessions have been much less common in my adult life

·         Higher highs and higher lows are occurring.  The mean will move up over time

These are all facts any financial advisor can look up and discuss with you.  If they are primarily discussing the big gains from recent years and not looking at the coming year(s) mean reversion risk, I’d suggest you Be Prepared for what’s coming sooner than later and lead them into a risk discussion.

 

1.      Venable Park Investment Council Inc,, a Canadian financial advisory firm

2.      PS. The why for these last 50 years can be found in blogs including Fiat 25Oct24 and Debasement 21Oct25

Read More
Grant Halford Grant Halford

1929

Does History Rhyme?

Does History Rhyme?

October 1929 is regarded as the start of the Great Depression.  More specifically, the US and Canadian stock markets ended their huge run up and began their dramatic multi-year decline that fateful month.  Andrew Ross Sorkin has recently released an historical book (1) of the key players and events surrounding this monumental time in North American financial history.

In promoting his book, Sorkin has appeared on many podcasts (2) (3) and always ends up discussing what was and can be learned from that crash and how it may be applied to our current situation.  Let’s take a tour through the learnings and their applicable knowledge.

Then vs Now

Revolutionary changes were occurring in society like the advent of radio, the mainstreaming of automobiles, and public access to the stock market.  Debt became a mainstream tool for the first time.  The US was applying tariffs for protectionist reasons.

Governments were small and ran surpluses.  Money was backed by gold.  Financial, banking and stock market regulation barely existed.  The stock market was essentially the wild, wild west of its time.

Income inequality was very high then.  Buying into the stock market with leverage was the lottery ticket to get ahead in life.

Today

Income inequality is even higher today.  The new lottery ticket is found in crypto and Mag 7 stocks.  RCA then is the Nvidia of today. <see Name Notes>

Remarkable euphoria around technology that will change the world. AI and data centers today.  Shocking high stock valuations are the result.  And high valuations always lead to correction.

Concurrently, remarkable levels of debt are being leveraged to drive the technology investment.  Private credit is where lots of today’s growing leverage is positioned, along with the corporations building the technology and the energy to power the data centers.

In Conclusion

Sorkin’s epilogue ends with:

“The enduring lesson is not that booms can be prevented or that busts can be fully averted.  It is that we need to remember how easily we forget.  The antidote to irrational exuberance is not regulation by itself, nor skepticism, but humility – the humility to know that no system is foolproof, no market fully rational, and no generation exempt.  The greater the heights of our certainty, the longer and harder we fall.”

There is no certainty of a bust or timing for a bust.  But, if history does rhyme, then it is signaling that stock market trouble is coming our way.  Let’s Be Prepared and minimize the fall.

1.      1929: Inside the Greatest Crash in Wall Street History – And How it Shattered a Nation, Andrew Ross Sorkin, 2025

2.      The New Yorker Interview, YouTube, November 2025

3.      Principles by Ray Dalio, How Debt Drives Every Crash, YouTube, November 2025

 

Name Notes:

·         Mag 7 stocks are Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla

·         RCA is Radio Corporation of America, created to control American Radio in the 1920’s

·         Nvidia is a leader in manufacturing graphics processing units

 

Read More